See ACORN's annual report for 2018.
By introducing a National Housing Strategy (NHS) and making a commitment to a rights-based approach to housing, the Federal Government is taking a significant step towards tackling Canada’s housing crisis. ACORN members welcome this national plan. Yet, we acknowledge that there is a long way to go to overcome the systemic issues that have led to so many homeless and underhoused Canadians.
Ontario ACORN surveyed 212 low-to-moderate income families across the province, to explore the impact of high child care costs. The survey revealed that many parents are forced to forgo work, education, savings, and basic necessities to pay for child care.
This groundbreaking report maps out the strategies and practices that lie behind today’s most successful advocacy campaigns both in Canada and abroad. In the process, it demonstrates how and why they succeed in creating lasting change on the issues they address while so many others fail. Based on a study by authors Jason Mogus and Tom Liacas that looked at mostly U.S.-based case studies, this report now presents similar innovations in Canada by reviewing in depth case studies of eight breakthrough Canadian campaigns. The report’s goal is to transmit a model that can be learned and replicated by other campaigners for how to blend grassroots participation and organizing with disciplined central planning to win.
Nova Scotia ACORN's municipal platform
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner and ACORN Canada Present: Protect your Privacy - Online!
Results of BC ACORN's survey of Surrey candidates
This election season, ACORN sent out a nine-question survey to all elected candidates running in this year’s municipal election in Ottawa. Out of the thirty-eight respondents, the majority were in favour of many of the proposed changes that were outlined in the survey.
Through correspondence with the City of Ottawa, it was suggested to ACORN--by the individual responsible for administering polling station locations--that the city uses voter turnout rates as the primary criterion for where to locate polling stations. This is extremely problematic, for it goes against democratic principles for voting to be made more convenient to those who more regularly exercise that democratic right; instead, the more democratic criterion for the location of polling stations would, of course, be based on population density.